The Kavanaugh controversy was not just the usual leftist extremism. With it signaled the next level of unhinged reasoning and anti-commonsense. Dr. Christine Blasey-Ford accused Brett Kavanaugh of forcefully groping her at a party 36 years ago when he was 17 year old. All the witnesses denied they knew of the party. There was no corroborating evidence and Ford herself couldn't remember the exact day or place the incident occurred. Her story changed a bit as to approximately when it happened. She claimed the incident gave her claustrophobia and a fear of flying, a claim contradicted by a longtime ex-boyfriend. He also never heard of the sexual assault. Furthermore, he said Dr. Ford did coach someone in taking a polygraph test--something she denied during her testimony in front of the senate judiciary committee. There simply wasn't a shred of evidence to pin this on Kavanaugh.
The most compelling piece of evidence I found was the credentials of Dr. Ford. Michelle Malkin explained Dr. Ford's expertise in data analysis, statistical analysis and SPSS--"a software platform using advanced statistical analysis using a vast library of machine learning algorithms, text analysis and open source extensibility." People who do this kind of work are extremely detail oriented. "Their success depends on precision, accuracy, and mastery of data." This does not sound like the Dr. Ford we saw in front of the committee. She couldn't even recall wether or not she gave all of her therapists' notes to the Washington Post. All of this information makes Ford highly suspicious of using a bogus allegation to derail a conservative judge from getting confirmed ahead of the midterm elections.
Two more women came with allegations of unwanted sexual assault including Julie Swetnick claiming Kavanaugh was standing by punch bowls, possibly drugging the punch to take advantage of women, and later in a line of boys waiting to gang rape inebriated girls. This outlandish allegation thankfully didn't take hold of even Democrats, but the damage was done as women tell congress a vote for Kavanaugh is a vote against women. I'm not kidding.
Saturday, Kavanaugh was sworn in with women screaming and clawing at the large bronze doors. Outside the capital there were women crying, telling their 'survivor' stories.
What took the cake for me was seeing an op-ed from the NYT titled: "White Women, Come Get Your People" by Alexis Grenell.
Gender traitors? You mean the female senators should vote against Kavanaugh solely because they're female? Isn't that the textbook definition of sexist? And what's wrong with teaching girls to be modest? We say don't objectify women and then encourage women to objectify themselves at slut walks and pride marches. There's nothing prideful about a women baring herself publicly. I know from experience.
Political Correctness (cultural marxism) has ramped up since my college days at HWS. Thankfully, many are waking up and leaving the Left to join the #WalkAway movement and embrace common sense, classical liberalism.
The most compelling piece of evidence I found was the credentials of Dr. Ford. Michelle Malkin explained Dr. Ford's expertise in data analysis, statistical analysis and SPSS--"a software platform using advanced statistical analysis using a vast library of machine learning algorithms, text analysis and open source extensibility." People who do this kind of work are extremely detail oriented. "Their success depends on precision, accuracy, and mastery of data." This does not sound like the Dr. Ford we saw in front of the committee. She couldn't even recall wether or not she gave all of her therapists' notes to the Washington Post. All of this information makes Ford highly suspicious of using a bogus allegation to derail a conservative judge from getting confirmed ahead of the midterm elections.
Two more women came with allegations of unwanted sexual assault including Julie Swetnick claiming Kavanaugh was standing by punch bowls, possibly drugging the punch to take advantage of women, and later in a line of boys waiting to gang rape inebriated girls. This outlandish allegation thankfully didn't take hold of even Democrats, but the damage was done as women tell congress a vote for Kavanaugh is a vote against women. I'm not kidding.
Saturday, Kavanaugh was sworn in with women screaming and clawing at the large bronze doors. Outside the capital there were women crying, telling their 'survivor' stories.
What took the cake for me was seeing an op-ed from the NYT titled: "White Women, Come Get Your People" by Alexis Grenell.
"After a confirmation process where women all but slit their wrists, letting their stories of sexual trauma run like rivers of blood through the Capitol, the Senate still voted to confirm Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. With the exception of Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, all the women in the Republican conference caved, including Senator Susan Collins of Maine, who held out until the bitter end."
"These women are gender traitors, to borrow a term from the dystopian TV series “The Handmaid’s Tale.” They’ve made standing by the patriarchy a full-time job. The women who support them show up at the Capitol wearing “Women for Kavanaugh” T-shirts, but also probably tell their daughters to put on less revealing clothes when they go out. "
Gender traitors? You mean the female senators should vote against Kavanaugh solely because they're female? Isn't that the textbook definition of sexist? And what's wrong with teaching girls to be modest? We say don't objectify women and then encourage women to objectify themselves at slut walks and pride marches. There's nothing prideful about a women baring herself publicly. I know from experience.
Political Correctness (cultural marxism) has ramped up since my college days at HWS. Thankfully, many are waking up and leaving the Left to join the #WalkAway movement and embrace common sense, classical liberalism.
